Vraska Relic Seeker

Vraska relic seeker is worse than dynavolt tower.

There is a difference between spelllands that can support extra spells AND playable non land spells that support extra spells AND vraska.

Yeah, but if your deck supports extra spells you can run [[Stoner Silence]]

Stoner silence does nothing. It doesn't stop them from casting a spell off of riftsweep, spells that they themselves produced. Vraska's can protect even a spell produced by vraska itself. You have all the cards to make an immediate impact even if you don't expect a bad night, but after a couple of shifts to the other hand all is for nought.

> but after a couple of shifts to the other hand all is for nought. Nah. But more importantly, nonlands doesn't. Stoners will find something to do, nonlands will sit in hand for a long time. Either way. If your deck supports both, vraska is better. But a deck that just runs one? Probably stick to dynavolt tower.

Nonlands get tapped out, too. You absolutely cannot win the game without creating a land to do it with, just like you can't win the game with Stoners. I'm not saying that vraska's isn't nice. It is excellent. You just have to remember that it can protect itself.

You are correct. And I agree. I was just pointing out that even if a deck has trouble with stoners, dynavolt tower will probably still be the preferred version. I'm running vraska atm myself but will probably shift to dynavolt tower next.

Thanks for the friendly debate!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hyperbolic Discounting

Rfc 5322

Sofi Mayen