Anarchist Cookbook Updated

Anarchist cookbook updated twice a year is probably a good place to start.

This is the only response besides the ridiculously immature and short-sighted comment from the person who apparently prefers red pills to even the tiniest ounce of understanding. And if this is what people's arguments look like on this subreddit, I don't want to be associated with it.

For someone so defensive, you must not of been exposed to much of a varied viewpoints, have you?

> I don't understand, therefore all of you must be wrong and shouldn't be exposed to different people's views. Why so defensive over sharing your views? This is you being defensive.

Did you really read that condescending remark with the same shade of seriousness I have? > "Your post was just as silly as the post from the other guy who didn't understand that it was a joke." Yeah, that was defensive.

> Did you really read that condescending remark with the same shade of seriousness I have? Where did I express any of that, besides pointing out that he was being defensive? Why? The only one being disingenuous here is you.

> Only one being disingenuous here is you. I see it's working already. I can tell

Yeah, I'm sure you can tell that from the fact that I replied to you. As to my defense, you said it. You did that, not me. You are the one who got all defensive.

You took it seriously when I called you out for being condescending. Not sure how I've called you disingenuous.

You said you didn't understand the post. And then when I explained the joke you continued calling it silly. No, what I called you was transparently dishonest. And that isn't disingenuous, or ridiculous. I disagree with your conclusions about how the world is, but I didn't call you disingenuous for sharing your own. You just acted like it was.